ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL.
Started by Mona, November 16, 2011, 08:46:14 pm
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Nayrman on March 11, 2012, 09:38:23 amIndeed. That's what I really hate about bill structures. You can add so much poop behind the bill that as long as you make the bill title and name "Help our troops!" act you can add pretty much add dictator level stuff in there and get away with it. And even if there weren't tons of corporate lobbying to get the internet butchered beyond all belief, the government would certainly want to just to make sure they can spy on us at all times. Because, after all, they want to keep an eye out for TERRORISTS *winkwinknudgenudgesaynomore* Because, after all, if you're not a terrorist you have nothing to hid and should willingly let the government search through everything you've ever looked at. The direction this country is going in is just awful.
Quote from: Michio Kaku on March 11, 2012, 10:05:29 pmCommunism isn't the word you're looking for
Quote from: Z on April 11, 2012, 06:26:41 pmFacebook activity would decrease if people lost the ability to share most websites over it.Internet activity in general would decline. This isn't good for an overwhelming majority of online businesses. If only they could see the big picture.
Quote from: Kayo on April 11, 2012, 06:15:52 pm'AT&T, Facebook, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Oracle Corporation, Symantec and Verizon" all support CISPA..Fucking.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on April 13, 2012, 04:25:37 amI wasn't expecting Microsoft. :/ We're definitely screwed this time.Hilarious how none of those are media companies. They just want to be able to spy on us.
Quote from: Kayo on April 13, 2012, 12:18:35 pmI hope Anonymous is ready for this.
Page created in 0.125 seconds with 18 queries.